<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What not to Twitter&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flowz.com/2009/01/what-not-to-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flowz.com/2009/01/what-not-to-twitter/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-not-to-twitter</link>
	<description>Our brain goo cup overfloweth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://flowz.com/2009/01/what-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://over.flowz.com/?p=251#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve updated the post to include Mr. Andrews&#039; response.

That very well may be true or it may just be him trying to cover his hind parts.  I&#039;ll give him the benefit of doubt and, certainly, my sympathy there.  I fully agree, people have a right to express themselves and expose intolerance and evil.

Unfortunately, there is a huge mistake here.

You need to watch what you say when dealing with your client and on the job.  In all forms.  I&#039;m sure that his 140 characters or less comment, even being misunderstood, turned his presentation into a waste of time and strained a huge relationship, at least for a moment.

Think about what would have happened if he had twittered towards specifics of the event.  He would have been welcomed with consoling arms and apologies instead of animosity and spite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated the post to include Mr. Andrews&#8217; response.</p>
<p>That very well may be true or it may just be him trying to cover his hind parts.  I&#8217;ll give him the benefit of doubt and, certainly, my sympathy there.  I fully agree, people have a right to express themselves and expose intolerance and evil.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is a huge mistake here.</p>
<p>You need to watch what you say when dealing with your client and on the job.  In all forms.  I&#8217;m sure that his 140 characters or less comment, even being misunderstood, turned his presentation into a waste of time and strained a huge relationship, at least for a moment.</p>
<p>Think about what would have happened if he had twittered towards specifics of the event.  He would have been welcomed with consoling arms and apologies instead of animosity and spite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsha Keeffer</title>
		<link>http://flowz.com/2009/01/what-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsha Keeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://over.flowz.com/?p=251#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Except that the lesson runs deeper.  There&#039;s more.

Mr. Andrews comment was actually made in response to a racial incident he experienced outside of the city.  His comment had nothing whatever to do with FedEx or Memphis.

I think people bashed by racists have the right to express themselves - and should call it out so that it isn&#039;t tolerated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that the lesson runs deeper.  There&#8217;s more.</p>
<p>Mr. Andrews comment was actually made in response to a racial incident he experienced outside of the city.  His comment had nothing whatever to do with FedEx or Memphis.</p>
<p>I think people bashed by racists have the right to express themselves &#8211; and should call it out so that it isn&#8217;t tolerated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

